SASKATOON – A report commissioned after controversy circled a well being professor’s claims of being Métis says the College of Saskatchewan was unprepared for Indigenous identification fraud and uneducated on Indigenous folks.
“Indigenous identification fraudsters have uncovered the ignorance of USask with respect to Indigenous peoples,” says the report by Jean Teillet launched Thursday.
The College of Saskatchewan contracted Teillet, a lawyer who focuses on Indigenous rights, to do an impartial investigation earlier than well being professor Carrie Bourassa resigned from her place earlier this 12 months.
Bourassa was positioned on depart and suspended from her duties as a professor within the School of Medicinelast 12 months, following a CBC report that her claims about being Métis didn’t add up.
Peter Stoicheff, the college’s president, mentioned the report is just not about Bourassa, as a result of she is not an worker of the college.
“It seems that very tough concern straight within the eye in a really helpful means for the whole nation,” Stoicheff mentioned.
The report says the problem of Indigenous determine fraud is confronted by universities and different establishments throughout the nation, which have lengthy relied on self-identification. Some universities have dedicated to enhancing insurance policies round Indigenous identification, together with the College of Saskatchewan, College of Manitoba and Queen’s College in Ontario.
It says universities didn’t anticipate and weren’t ready for non-Indigenous folks making an attempt to benefit from alternatives created for his or her Indigenous colleagues. And there was a common failure to acknowledge fraudsters and ignorance about find out how to determine Indigenous Peoples.
Teillet refers within the report back to the instances of creator Joseph Boyden and Michelle Latimer, a filmmaker and producer, who each had their Indigenous identities questioned in recent times.
The report lists purple flags to assist acknowledge Indigenous identification fraud, together with conflicting tales, obscure claims, repeated references to ceremony and claiming membership in a pan-Indigenous group. It additionally says household tales or secrets and techniques and a reliance on stereotypes ought to elevate considerations.
“This isn’t a proposal that the academy start to police identification,” the report says.
“It’s a proposal that the academy educate itself about Indigenous identification fraud efficiency patterns and take steps to get rid of the fraudsters.”
The report says asking for verification proof is just not figuring out whether or not an applicant is Indigenous. It’s putting in a course of to make sure honesty.
Stoicheff mentioned the report has suggestions for a way the College of Saskatchewan ought to implement its new coverage on Indigenous identification verification, which was put in place following the Bourassa controversy.
The coverage, which was created by an Indigenous-led group and accredited in July, requires folks to current evidenceto assist their identification if they’re making use of for employment or scholarships. The college mentioned it’s asking Indigenous communities to find out what proof is important.
It has already confronted criticism, with some folks saying the document-driven method is colonial and might pass over Indigenous individuals who have been disconnected from their communities by residential colleges, adoption or the child-welfare system. Others have mentioned the coverage creates a burden that might discourage Indigenous college students from making use of for scholarships.
An Indigenous-led standing committee was created to assist inform how the coverage will proceed to play out.
Airini, who goes by one title and is the College of Saskatchewan’s provost and vice-president educational, mentioned the coverage was developed by and for Indigenous folks. She mentioned the report reveals that whereas the street could also be bumpy, it’s getting into the appropriate route.
“We’re seeing that it’s a affirmation that we’re following good course of,” she mentioned.
The report and its suggestions are to be offered to the standing committee to assist form the coverage on identification. It will also be used as a instructing device for human sources and recruitment employees, Stoicheffsaid.
Stoicheff added that the reporthas essential data for all universities that need to develop related insurance policies.
“That is an establishment of studying and better studying, and there’s at all times quite a bit to study.”
This report by The Canadian Press was first revealed Nov. 3, 2022.