NEW YORK (AP) — Deliberations that started Wednesday within the trial of a person charged with killing eight folks alongside a Manhattan bike path rapidly hit a snag, as jurors despatched the choose a be aware asking if he would face new felony fees in the event that they acquit him.
The question solely an hour into the jury’s deliberations was a shocking twist within the trial of Sayfullo Saipov, whose legal professionals admit that he rented a truck and drove onto the Hudson River path on Halloween in 2017, killing eight cyclists and injuring a couple of dozen different folks.
You are reading: Jury deliberations in NYC bike path killings hit early snag
The protection argued that jurors ought to acquit Saipov of sure fees, notably racketeering counts, in the event that they discover that he didn’t kill folks to realize membership to the Islamic State group, a U.S.-designated terrorist group. The be aware appeared to point that some jurors consider the argument pertained to all fees.
Protection legal professionals, although, had aimed the argument on the racketeering fees specifically, hoping to win acquittals on among the 28 counts that would end in a dying sentence. If Saipov is convicted on any of these, a dying penalty section of the trial would start earlier than the identical jury days later.
Jurors heard about two weeks of proof together with testimony from FBI brokers and quite a few victims of the assault.
Saipov, who moved to america in 2010 from Uzbekistan and lived in Ohio and Florida earlier than becoming a member of household in Paterson, New Jersey, has been in a federal jail because the assault.
The assault ended after the truck plowed via two poles and right into a small faculty bus. Saipov was shot within the decrease torso and injured by a police officer. Prosecutors mentioned it spoiled his plan to proceed to the Brooklyn Bridge and kill as many individuals as attainable.
After studying the jury be aware aloud, U.S. District Choose Vernon S. Broderick despatched the panel residence for the day. He informed legal professionals they may talk about tips on how to reply on Thursday morning.
“It is a complication,” the choose mentioned.
The jurors’ be aware had three parts. Within the first, they requested if protection legal professionals had been contending that Saipov dedicated the assaults however was merely charged with the improper crime.
Then they requested a hypothetical, questioning if Saipov would face the identical fees if he had gone overseas and gotten an identification card from the Islamic State group earlier than killing the cyclists.
Lastly they requested, “If we discover he didn’t do it for ISIS membership, and subsequently shouldn’t be responsible, will he be retried with totally different fees?”